ConnectApprovedKnowledgetoReviewableAI.

Build access-filtered retrieval over agreed sources. Evaluate answer support, citations, missing knowledge and refusal behavior before a production release.

Access ReviewPrivate DeployRetention PlanEvaluation Gates
Your PDFs / Docs/ DatabaseChunking EngineVector EmbeddingsVector DB(Pinecone)LLM Engine(Selected Model)Draft Answer + Source Check
RAG architecture technical diagram on whiteboard

Choose Retrieval, Context or Fine-Tuning

Three approaches with different tradeoffs. These are design considerations, not provider rankings or guarantees; evaluate the actual configuration on your own test set.

Direct Prompt Context

  • ✕Provide selected policy context
  • ✕Incorrect answers remain possible
  • ✕Review actual data-processing terms
  • ✕Test source support explicitly
  • ✕Check input and output limits

Retrieval-Augmented Workflow

  • ✓Index only approved source scope
  • ✓Evaluate citations against source text
  • ✓Filter retrieval by user permission
  • ✓Validate retention and deletion rules
  • ✓Measure retrieval gaps and latency

Fine-Tuning Alone

  • !Needs a justified training objective
  • !Requires a model update plan
  • !Live sources need separate integration
  • !Needs suitable rights-cleared examples
  • !Still needs grounding and evaluation
Split screen phone mockup comparing hallucinated answer vs cited RAG answer

How We Make AI Know Your Business

The standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) flow, explained simply.

1

INGEST

Inventory permitted sources, parse their content and test chunk sizes. Preserve access rules, deletion handling and source versions during ingestion.

2

EMBED

Index selected content with source metadata and permissions. Evaluate retrieval coverage and refresh behavior before choosing the storage configuration.

3

ANSWER

Retrieve candidate passages for an authorized question. Generate a draft using approved the retrieved evidence; check citation support and refuse or escalate missing evidence.

Your Data Privacy Is Our Non-Negotiable

Confirm actual data flows, contractual terms and access controls for the selected architecture.

Which data may leave your environment?

Map prompts, retrieved passages, logs and backups. Confirm authorization, contractual terms, region, retention and deletion before sending confidential data.

What needs checking for a hosted service?

Review the selected service and account configuration, subprocessors, training terms, access controls and incident responsibilities; product names alone do not establish privacy.

What changes with self-hosting?

Evaluate licensing, hardware, patching, telemetry and operational access. Self-hosting still needs isolation tests and a named infrastructure owner.

Agree the Boundary:

Document data flows, identity checks, permissions and evidence requirements. Legal/compliance review and certification are separate responsibilities, not implied by this service.

Evaluate the Deployment and Workflow

Design options, not current model rankings or price quotes. Benchmark selected versions on agreed tasks and review provider terms at procurement; no universal winner is claimed.

Deployment option

Hosted API

Metered
Evaluation Focus

Evaluate task quality and integration effort

Data Review
Review service terms
Deployment option

Managed Platform

Scoped
Evaluation Focus

Assess identity, region and operational controls

Data Review
Verify configuration
Deployment option

Self-Hosted

Infra
Evaluation Focus

Compare hardware, licensing and maintenance

Data Review
Audit access paths
Evaluation option

Compact Model

Test
Evaluation Focus

Test a bounded task within resource limits

Data Review
Review deployment
Resilience option

Fallback Route

Budget
Evaluation Focus

Test safe degradation, spend and quality changes

Data Review
Approve all processors
Workflow option

Human Review

Review
Evaluation Focus

Escalate missing evidence and sensitive decisions

Data Review
Restrict reviewer access

The Modern AI Stack

Frameworks

  • LangChain
  • LlamaIndex
  • Semantic Kernel
  • DSPy
  • AutoGen

Vector Databases

  • Pinecone
  • Weaviate
  • Qdrant
  • pgvector
  • Chroma
  • Milvus

LLM APIs

  • OpenAI API
  • Anthropic API
  • Google AI Studio
  • AWS Bedrock
  • Azure OpenAI
  • Ollama

Data Processing

  • LangChain loaders
  • Unstructured.io
  • PyPDF2
  • Apache Tika

Infrastructure

  • FastAPI
  • Docker
  • Kubernetes
  • AWS Lambda
  • Vercel

Our Technical Integration Process

Handover source mappings, evaluation cases, runbooks and ownership. Production release requires agreed acceptance criteria.

1

Data Audit & Schema Mapping

We analyze your internal data sources (SQL, PDFs, Confluence) to determine cleanliness, access controls, and structure.

Deliverable:Data Architecture Document
2

Chunking Strategy & Embedding Selection

Compare chunking and embedding candidates on representative questions, languages and source formats.

Deliverable:Embedding Strategy Doc
3

Vector Database Setup & Indexing

Implement scoped indexing, permission filters, source updates and deletion propagation; test failure recovery.

Deliverable:Live Vector DB
4

LLM Integration & Prompt Engineering

Build a versioned retrieval API with citation checks, output validation, refusal paths and bounded retries.

Deliverable:Working API Endpoint
5

Evaluation & Release Review

Evaluate retrieval relevance, supported answers, refusal quality, leakage tests, latency and task cost; include expert review.

Deliverable:Evaluation & Failure Report
Test
Supported answers
Scope
Permitted sources
Review
Data boundaries
Budget
Latency and token cost

Design sample — illustrative quote and attribution, not verified client feedback.

Illustrative Reviewer Perspective

"A useful knowledge assistant would show its sources, respect access permissions and admit when the available documents do not support an answer."

SP
Sample Reviewer
Illustrative knowledge-team perspective
AI-powered internal knowledge base interface on laptop with cited source document reference

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Retrieval can miss relevant sources and generation can misread evidence. Evaluate retrieval coverage, citation support, refusal quality and permission leakage on agreed test cases.

Scope a Retrieval Pilot With Your Data.

Source readiness, evaluation and access checks determine milestones. Review quality before release.

Cookie Preferences

Optional analytics and performance tools stay off until you accept. You can change your choice from the footer; withdrawing acceptance reloads the page to stop loaded tools. Review our Cookie Policy to learn more.